As recently stated in the Sydney Morning Herald ’story here‘ a new 2007 study has found 22% of all paternity tests show that the assumed father of a child is in fact not the biological father. I realise these figures slightly elevated due to suspicion being the main motivation for the test in the first place, but it is an alarmingly high percentage.

I am not quite sure what I would do if I found out my 4 year old son was in fact progeny of one (for example only) Kyle Sandilands. Apart from the great joy I would have of tearing this niff limb from limb I would politely ask the cow and said niff for my money back.

What’s the rules on this stuff? Can you bash for biological reasons or is this sort of behaviour best left to the Nazi’s?