Nov 19 2007
Father’s ain’t Dad’s
As recently stated in the Sydney Morning Herald ’story here‘ a new 2007 study has found 22% of all paternity tests show that the assumed father of a child is in fact not the biological father. I realise these figures slightly elevated due to suspicion being the main motivation for the test in the first place, but it is an alarmingly high percentage.
I am not quite sure what I would do if I found out my 4 year old son was in fact progeny of one (for example only) Kyle Sandilands. Apart from the great joy I would have of tearing this niff limb from limb I would politely ask the cow and said niff for my money back.
What’s the rules on this stuff? Can you bash for biological reasons or is this sort of behaviour best left to the Nazi’s?
Its these bloody women these days!! To the majority of them it is just a great big money grab! I think the paternity tests should be mandatory in every child birth. Both parents have a right to know up front.
you have got the same chance of getting your money back as you have of cashing that TAB ticket of yours.
If in fact your 4 year old son was in fact the biological progeny of Kyle Sandilands then he would be greatful. In this instance it would be ok.
You ok shirvy? Shirvy, you ok?
I think Rob B is a real life niff!