<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mitchell Johnson in or out?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notasmartman.com/mitchell-johnson-in-or-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notasmartman.com/mitchell-johnson-in-or-out/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:59:29 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fat Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.notasmartman.com/mitchell-johnson-in-or-out/comment-page-1/#comment-4504</link>
		<dc:creator>Fat Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 03:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notasmartman.com/mitchell-johnson-in-or-out/#comment-4504</guid>
		<description>PS. What a shock to find out that Rob B is a mummy&#039;s boy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS. What a shock to find out that Rob B is a mummy&#8217;s boy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fat Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.notasmartman.com/mitchell-johnson-in-or-out/comment-page-1/#comment-4503</link>
		<dc:creator>Fat Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 03:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notasmartman.com/mitchell-johnson-in-or-out/#comment-4503</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with The Tongue, Johnson has to stay in. I can&#039;t believe it&#039;s even being questioned!! After Punter, he is the first player picked. Out of form he&#039;s still taken more wickets than most of the others.

His jealous, headline grabbing mother should pull her head in and keep her opinions private.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with The Tongue, Johnson has to stay in. I can&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s even being questioned!! After Punter, he is the first player picked. Out of form he&#8217;s still taken more wickets than most of the others.</p>
<p>His jealous, headline grabbing mother should pull her head in and keep her opinions private.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiger</title>
		<link>http://www.notasmartman.com/mitchell-johnson-in-or-out/comment-page-1/#comment-4484</link>
		<dc:creator>tiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notasmartman.com/mitchell-johnson-in-or-out/#comment-4484</guid>
		<description>Oh no.....more spelling lessons........please get be out of this upside down universe I am stuck in????

SJ&#039;s posts are intelligent?

IASM doesn&#039;t exist?

This is too strange........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no&#8230;..more spelling lessons&#8230;&#8230;..please get be out of this upside down universe I am stuck in????</p>
<p>SJ&#8217;s posts are intelligent?</p>
<p>IASM doesn&#8217;t exist?</p>
<p>This is too strange&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jethro</title>
		<link>http://www.notasmartman.com/mitchell-johnson-in-or-out/comment-page-1/#comment-4483</link>
		<dc:creator>Jethro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notasmartman.com/mitchell-johnson-in-or-out/#comment-4483</guid>
		<description>It is spelt Clark not Clarke that Clarke is Michael not Stuart. 

I think Johnson should play on. He proven in SA that he had the ability to destroy batting orders and he can do it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is spelt Clark not Clarke that Clarke is Michael not Stuart. </p>
<p>I think Johnson should play on. He proven in SA that he had the ability to destroy batting orders and he can do it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob B</title>
		<link>http://www.notasmartman.com/mitchell-johnson-in-or-out/comment-page-1/#comment-4481</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notasmartman.com/mitchell-johnson-in-or-out/#comment-4481</guid>
		<description>Get Johnson out of there. He disrespected his mother and deserves what is coming to him.

Siddle and Clark are very different bowlers in my opinion Tunksy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get Johnson out of there. He disrespected his mother and deserves what is coming to him.</p>
<p>Siddle and Clark are very different bowlers in my opinion Tunksy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tunksy</title>
		<link>http://www.notasmartman.com/mitchell-johnson-in-or-out/comment-page-1/#comment-4473</link>
		<dc:creator>Tunksy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notasmartman.com/mitchell-johnson-in-or-out/#comment-4473</guid>
		<description>Johnson is a match winner. If you want Clark in then you replace him for Siddle. They have a very similar style. If you had Clark and Siddle then it would be too predictable. An attcke needs to be versatile. Hifenhaus and Johnson NEED to be in the match. Flip the coin for the others</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johnson is a match winner. If you want Clark in then you replace him for Siddle. They have a very similar style. If you had Clark and Siddle then it would be too predictable. An attcke needs to be versatile. Hifenhaus and Johnson NEED to be in the match. Flip the coin for the others</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

